Overview of IAEA Safeguards Implementation in 2024
In an extensive effort to monitor global nuclear activities, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) implemented its safeguard measures across 190 States throughout 2024. These safeguards are primarily aimed at ensuring that nuclear materials are used solely for peaceful purposes and not diverted for military use. The IAEA’s recent report provides a comprehensive breakdown of how these safeguards were applied and the conclusions drawn from their application.
Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements (CSAs) and Additional Protocols (APs)
A significant component of the IAEA’s efforts involves Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements (CSAs), which are legally binding agreements between the IAEA and a state, requiring the state to declare its nuclear material and facilities subject to IAEA oversight. Out of the 190 states, 182 had CSAs in place. Among these, 137 states had also adopted Additional Protocols (APs), which are measures that enhance the IAEA’s ability to verify the peaceful use of all nuclear material within a state.
For 75 of these 137 states, the IAEA made what is known as the "broader conclusion" that all nuclear material remained in peaceful activities. This broader conclusion was notably reached for Morocco for the first time, marking a significant milestone in its nuclear transparency and cooperation with international monitoring efforts.
However, in 61 states with both CSAs and APs, the IAEA could only determine that declared nuclear materials were being used peacefully. This limited conclusion was due to ongoing evaluations concerning the absence of undeclared nuclear materials and activities, indicating that further verification is necessary to reach a broader conclusion.
States with CSAs but Without APs
The IAEA’s report also highlights the status of 31 states that have CSAs but have not yet adopted APs. For these states, the IAEA confirmed that declared nuclear material remained in peaceful activities. However, without the additional verification measures provided by APs, the scope of the IAEA’s conclusions is inherently limited.
Non-Nuclear-Weapon States and the NPT
At the end of 2024, the IAEA faced challenges with three non-nuclear-weapon states that are parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) but have not yet enforced CSAs as required by Article III of the Treaty. This lack of enforcement means that the IAEA cannot draw any safeguard conclusions for these states, highlighting a gap in the global nuclear non-proliferation framework.
Item-Specific Safeguards Agreements
The IAEA also implements item-specific safeguards in three states: India, Israel, and Pakistan. These safeguards are tailored to specific nuclear materials, facilities, or other items. For these countries, the IAEA concluded that the nuclear material and facilities under these agreements continued to be used for peaceful purposes. This conclusion is crucial in promoting transparency and trust regarding the nuclear activities of these states, which are not signatories to the NPT.
Voluntary Offer Agreements with Nuclear-Weapon States
The five recognized nuclear-weapon states under the NPT—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—are subject to voluntary offer agreements with the IAEA. These agreements allow the IAEA to apply safeguards to selected nuclear facilities. In 2024, the IAEA concluded that nuclear material in these facilities either remained in peaceful activities or was withdrawn from safeguards per the terms of the agreements. This arrangement underscores the commitment of these nuclear-weapon states to maintain transparency in their civilian nuclear activities, even as they retain nuclear arsenals.
Technical Aspects and Global Implications
The IAEA’s safeguards are a critical component of the global non-proliferation regime, which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. CSAs and APs serve as robust tools for verification, allowing the IAEA to monitor nuclear material and ensure its peaceful use. While CSAs provide a basic framework for monitoring, APs expand the IAEA’s capabilities, enabling more comprehensive inspections and access to additional information.
The broader and more limited conclusions drawn by the IAEA reflect varying levels of transparency and cooperation among states. Achieving a broader conclusion requires exhaustive verification, including confirming the absence of undeclared nuclear activities. States that have not yet adopted APs or enforced CSAs present challenges to the effectiveness of the global safeguards system, as gaps in verification can lead to uncertainties about the peaceful nature of their nuclear activities.
Importance of Continued Vigilance and Cooperation
The IAEA’s report underscores the importance of continued vigilance and international cooperation in maintaining and strengthening the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. States are encouraged to adopt and enforce CSAs and APs to enhance transparency and build confidence in their nuclear programs.
Moreover, the participation of both nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states in the IAEA’s safeguards system is crucial for global security and stability. By adhering to these agreements, states demonstrate their commitment to preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
Conclusion
In summary, the IAEA’s 2024 report on the implementation of safeguards highlights significant progress in monitoring global nuclear activities while also revealing areas that require further action. The broader conclusions reached for several states, including Morocco, reflect positive steps toward enhanced nuclear transparency. However, the report also points to challenges posed by states that have yet to fully integrate into the safeguards system.
As the IAEA continues its mission to ensure the peaceful use of nuclear materials, the international community must remain vigilant and cooperative, fostering an environment where nuclear energy can be safely and sustainably used for the benefit of all. The IAEA’s work is foundational to global efforts in nuclear non-proliferation, and its findings serve as a reminder of the collective responsibility to prevent the misuse of nuclear materials and technology.
For more Information, Refer to this article.
